Their Angry Creed

Herbert Purdy

Description

Forty-five years after women's liberationists first laid down their challenge, chanting 'Women demand equality!' and 'I'm a second-class citizen', their narratives are now so universally accepted that few people dare speak truth to the power in the land that feminism has undoubtedly become. However, this book does just that. 
Opening with a startling revelation in 2014 by Mallory Millett, sister of Kate Millett - a mentally-ill Marxist apologist, and probably the prime mover in the women's liberation movement around 1970 - Their Angry Creed is a detailed exposé of what she and her co-conspirators were planning from the start. 
The author shows how these activists influenced a generation of women - many of whom are now in prominent and powerful positions - to seek a seismic shift in the power balance between women and men by dividing society along the fault line of gender.
Feminism has never been about equality for women. It is cultural Marxism, whose principles uphold matriarchy - the social superiority of women - which is to be achieved through the destruction of marriage, the re-engineering of the family, moving women en masse out of the home and into the workforce, and the disruption of society as we know it. 
Describing how these activists have already secured unreasonable and unfair privilege for women and girls, he points to the demonisation of manhood, men's effective social emasculation, the invasion of men's social spaces to the point of harassment, and the relentless excision of fathers from families. 
He ends by warning of a coming backlash from men.

Sujets

• Feminist Theory
• Social Science
• Sociologie, société et politique
• Feminism

Informations

• Publié par: eBookIt.com
• Date de parution: 28 juin 2016
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9780957168862
• Langue: English

Extrait

Title Page
Copyright
Introduction
Foreword

Chapter One - Revolution!
Chapter Two - The Swinging Sixties
Chapter Three - An Angry Generation
Chapter Four - Making the Personal Political
Chapter Five - Feminism
Chapter Six - On Patriarchy
Chapter Seven - Marxism and 'The Woman Question'
Chapter Eight - The Psycho-Social Aspects of Feminism
Chapter Nine - Institutionalised Feminism
Chapter Ten - The Social Outcomes of Feminism
Chapter Eleven - The Feminist Fifth Column
Chapter Twelve - The Line, It Is Drawn
THEIR ANGRY CREED

The shocking history of feminism,
and how it is destroying our way of life.








Herbert Purdy

lps publishing
Publisher’s note:

While every possible effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this book is accurate, neither the publisher not the author can accept responsibility for any errors or omissions, however caused. No responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting, or refraining from action, as a result of the material in this publication, can be accepted by the publisher or the author.

This edition first published 2016.

Copyright © 2016 Herbert Purdy. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, distributed, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.

For permission requests, contact the author at http://herbertpurdy.com, marking your enquiry ‘Attention: Permissions Coordinator’.

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

ISBN:   978-0-9571688-6-2  

Cover design by Des Reynolds

lpspublishing.co.uk
INTRODUCTION

It is almost half-a-century since women’s liberationists first laid down their challenge to the world, chanting ‘Women demand equality,’ and ‘I’m a second-class citizen’, and the feminist narrative of the historically victimised woman, needing to strive heroically for her rights in a male-dominated society, is a theme that has become burnt into our social consciousness. The entire paradigm is so politically charged - so politically correct - that no politician of any hue would dare have an all-male cabinet, anymore than a large company would contemplate having an all-male board of directors; and this is causing women to be pushed, promoted, and inserted into every walk of life simply because they are women, which amounts to naked preference, bordering on positive discrimination.  
Moral panics about rape and domestic violence are rife, and a plethora of women’s help agencies exist to meet the perceived demand for women’s aid. Most of them are funded by central government, with ring-fenced budgets, and they feed a constant stream of propaganda about men as potential rapists or wife beaters to the press. Mostly it is patently untrue, but, like all propaganda, it is effective in embedding these false social narratives, which, in a feedback loop, justifies the existence of these agencies and secures their funding. Our universities are now hotbeds of gender politics, where free speech is all but closed down, not least because of the strident demand of millennial women students that they must not have their feelings hurt or be made to feel unsafe. In response, many universities are providing ‘safe spaces’ for women students, free from their male counterparts; such is the degree to which this hysteria is gripping our campuses.  
An alleged pay gap is constantly being promoted by feminist-dominated ‘think tanks’, politicians, and even heads of state such as the President of the United States, Barack Obama, who couch their message in terms of women being forced to work effectively for nothing from 9th November until the end of the year. This is always portrayed as discrimination, despite the fact that an average woman in her lifetime will undoubtedly earn less than an average man, simply because she is likely to have children, and that causes her to make work-life balance decisions. However, feminist campaigners will not allow these explanations, insisting that women are being actively discriminated against.
Even inadvertent slips of the tongue about women, let alone honest attempts to speak about the changing role and place of women in society, are instantly met with a storm of hysterical protest from prominent feminists, such as female MPs, women’s advocacy groups, and women in the media, who allege sexism and misogyny with an anger that seems to know no bounds of reasonable behaviour. Character assassination and premature career termination - even of highly eminent people - await anyone foolhardy enough to speak truth to the power in the land that feminism has now become, and this has created such a climate of fear that it has closed down rational social discourse as effectively as any totalitarian regime of the past. As Kevin Alfred Strom once said, ‘To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.’
However, this book does just that. It is an analytical, sometimes polemical account of the historical development of feminism: its precepts, dogma, and its social outcomes. It is an honest attempt to bring clarity and truth to what is actually happening to our society under this deeply divisive totalitarian ideology, which, like a wrecking ball, is tearing us apart; dividing us along a fault-line of ‘gender’. My principal thesis is that despite feminism claiming as its credentials the liberal Enlightenment ideals of freedom and equality of opportunity, it is a masquerade beneath which lies a much darker agenda: one that is being worked out by an ideologically driven elite, and which is anathema to everything Western democracies stand for. In 1970, Germaine Greer said this,

‘Women’s liberation, if it abolishes the patriarchal family, will abolish a necessary substructure of the authoritarian state, and once that withers away Marx will have come true, willy nilly, so let’s get on with it.’ (‘Revolution’ The Female Eunuch  1970)

Influenced by academics such as Greer, who have colonised our campuses, turning them into madrassas of radical feminist theory, a small but influential cadre of highly politically motivated former Women’s Liberationists has succeeded to a remarkable degree in implementing what she was expressing. For more than 40 years, through politics, the media, and other key social institutions, these ideologically-driven women (and, it has to be said, men of the same persuasion) have been at work behind the scenes, gaining control of the levers of social and political power, and inexorably changing social policy, the law, and ordinary people’s lives in order to conform us all to their dogma.
Greer looked forward to a time when the patriarchal family - the nuclear family - would be abolished. That time has come. Patriarchal families, cemented together by the institution of marriage, have been the bricks in the wall of our society for centuries, but the entire edifice is now in ruins because of Marxist-inspired feminist revolution. Greer’s reference to Marxism (echoed, incidentally, by most of the early women’s liberation movers and shakers) can be traced back to the 1848 Communist Manifesto , in which Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels openly stated that the aim of the communists was to abolish the ‘bourgeois’ institution of marriage and create a legalised community of women.  
The process is simple. If you remove the interdependence of men and women, you will destroy the institution of lifelong marriage as ‘one flesh’. If you destroy that then the fall of the patriarchal family will automatically follow. Then the way is clear for a new social order to be constructed – in Marx’s case it was communism – and that is precisely what the Women’s Liberationists and their fellow travellers and acolytes, now called ‘third wave feminists’, continue to seek in what is undoubtedly a sustained campaign to bring about permanent social change. This is what our society looks like after 45 years of feminism: Marriage, once the committed union for life of a man and a woman, and the key institution that guaranteed social stability, has been de-constructed, re-defined, and all but destroyed. Today, in what amounts to a tidal wave of divorce, initiated by women three times as often as men, half of all marriages will fail, and their median expectation of lasting is only 11 years, according to the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) Marriage has been replaced by a legally uncommitted union of two ‘equal partners’ (another Marxist dogma), in which technically illegitimate children are being born wholesale, and which has an even worse prognosis of lasting than marriage The social role of the mother has been changed. Once the bearer and nurturer of young children until their emerging viability as ’teens, women now combine career with child-bearing and upbringing, attempting to reconcile an impossible set of roles, and often unable to give their best to any of them – least of all to themselves The ready provision of maternity leave and the increasing provision of child care allowances from state funding is manoeuvring mothers into leaving their children’s upbringing, in their most crucial formative years, to strangers   Politically correct child-minders, operating in what amount to state-funded nurseries, are taking over the role of shaping and forming our future generations according to broader societal values, rather than the values of their own families. This is what totalitarian states do Under successive interventions from governments of all political hues - joined only by a common acceptance that feminism is a good thing - women hav