In 1992, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), signed by over 160 countries and hailed as the key symbol of a common vision for saving Earth's biodiversity, set forth three primary mandates: preserving biodiversity, using biodiversity components sustainably, and enabling economic benefit-sharing. The CBD-which gave signatory countries the ability to claim sovereignty over nonhuman genetic resources native to each nation-defined biodiversity through a politics of nationhood in ways that commodified genetic resources. In Biogenetic Paradoxes of the Nation Sakari Tamminen traces the ways in which the CBD's seemingly compatible yet ultimately paradox-ridden aims became manifest in efforts to create, conserve, and capitalize on distinct animal and plant species. In using Finland as a case study with which to understand the worldwide efforts to convert species into manifestations of national identity, Tamminen shows how the CBD's policies contribute less to biodiversity conservation than to smoothing the way for frictionless operation of biotechnologically assisted circuits of the global bioeconomy. Tamminen demonstrates how an intimate look at the high-level politics and technical processes of defining national genetic resources powerfully illuminates the limits of anthropocentric biopolitical theory.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,1398€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
biogenetic paradoxes of the nation
Experîmenta Futures: Technoogîca îves, scîentîfic arts, anthropoogîca voîces A serîes edîted by Mîchael M. J. Fîscher and Joseph Dumît
biogenetic paradoxes of the nation F I N N C AT T L E ,
Natîona Advîsory Board on Genetîc Resources anîma genetîc resources actor network theory Conventîon on Bîoogîca Dîversîty Anîma Breedîng Research Group
Unîon or the Protectîon o New Varîetîes o Pants
This page intentionally left blank
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thank you . . . . . . to a the scîentîsts, experts, and poîcy makers who aowed me înto theîr words and shared theîr way o seeîng the word, anîmas, pants, and îe’s mysterîes beyond bîoogîca bodîes. . . . to my academîc coeagues or the înteectua companîonshîp, never-endîng dîscussîons, debates, and arguments that deveop thoughts and îdeas urther. . . . to rîends, od and new, that I first encountered durîng my re-search, wrîtîng, and presentîng, wherever you are, near and ar. . . . to Mîke Fîscher, or coachîng and or detaîed comments pushîng the înîtîa manuscrîpt îdeas to a much better expressîon, specîficîty, and ormat. . . . to the Academy o Fînand or provîdîng the grant to finîsh thîs book. . . . to Ines, Maî, and Taîna, or theîr uncondîtîona ove.